ARTICLE

Volume 3,Issue 9

Cite this article
1
Download
27
Citations
63
Views
26 October 2025

An Analysis of the Penal Jurisdiction and Operation Mechanism of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Before the Implementation of the “Hong Kong National Security Law

Weitao Meng*
Show Less
1 Faculty of Political Science and Law, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, Guangdong, China
LNE 2025 , 3(9), 6–13; https://doi.org/10.18063/LNE.v3i9.924
© 2025 by the Author. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

The penal jurisdiction of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region has a unique legal status under the framework of the “ one country, two systems “ policy and the “ Basic Law of Hong Kong. “After the return of the Hong Kong SAR, it enjoys independent judicial power and final adjudication power according to law. Its penal jurisdiction reflects a high degree of independence and universality on the basis of the principle of territoriality, covering the vast majority of criminal cases occurring in Hong Kong. However, the exercise of this power has a clear scope, including being limited by the original legal system and principles, excluding jurisdiction over the conduct of the State, and being uniformly arranged by the central government in case of war or emergency. The operation mechanism of penal jurisdiction in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is a self-contained system, covering three stages of investigation, prosecution and trial. It is independently completed by local law enforcement and judicial institutions according to law, which embodies the high degree of autonomy and procedural independence of the criminal justice system in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The penal jurisdiction of the Hong Kong SAR and its operating mechanism reflect the fundamental requirements of the principle of national sovereignty and meet the practical requirements of “ one country, two systems. “ In the future, in the field of safeguarding national security affairs, we should strengthen the connection between the local penal jurisdiction of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the direct jurisdiction of the central government, ensure that the “ one country, two systems “ is stable and far-reaching, and effectively safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests.

Keywords
“One country
two systems”
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Penal jurisdiction
Operating mechanism
Funding
Guangdong Provincial Education Science Planning Higher Education Special Project (Project No.: 2025GXJK0578); Guangdong Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning General Project (Project No.: GD25THQ01)
References

[1] Wang X, 2002, On the Penal Jurisdiction of the Special Administrative Region. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2002(1): 109.

[2] Wang S, 2006, Introduction to the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. China Democracy and Legal System Publishing House, Beijing, 299–300.

[3] You S, 2012, Hong Kong Judicial System. Commercial Press (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., 2012: 6.

[4] Zhu SH, 2017, The Formation, Evolution and Reform of the Judicial System in Hong Kong. Proceedings of the National School of Administration, 2017(3): 33–34.

[5] Sun C, 2005, With the Political System of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. World Chinese Publishing House (Hong Kong), Hong Kong, 123.

[6] Zhang T, Chen W, 1992, On the Jurisdiction of Criminal Cases Involving Hong Kong. Legal Research, 1992(3): 37–38.

[7] Ezekiel D, 2013, On the Judicial Power of Final Adjudication of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Xiamen University Press, Xiamen, 31–32.

[8] Li XP, 2013, On the Locality of the Court. Legal Review, 2013(3): 3.

[9] Si W, 1997, Hong Kong’s Judicial System Before and After 1997 – Hong Kong’s Constitution Series IV. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 1997(1): 67.

[10] Wang Y, 2016, The Resumption of the Exercise of Sovereignty. People’s Publishing House, Beijing, 241–242.

[11] Wang Y, 2008, A Study on the Constitutional Spirit of ‘One Country, Two Systems’. Guangdong People’s Publishing House, 2008.

[12] Dong M, 1997, On the Dominance of Case Law in Hong Kong Law. Politics and Law, 1997(1): 53.

[13] Wu T, 2013, On the Boundary of the Jurisdiction of the Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Contemporary Hong Kong and Macao Studies, 2013(1): 107.

[14] Li X, 1990, Hong Kong Basic Law and Hong Kong-related Penal Jurisdiction. Journal of Law, 1990(4): 13.

[15] Luo W, 2012, ‘One Country, Two Systems’ and the New Theory of the Basic Law of the Macao Special Administrative Region. Social Science Literature Publishing House, Beijing, 121.

[16] Yuan FQ, 2011, Interpretation of the Basic Law and the Jurisdiction of the Hong Kong Court – Taking the Congo’s Sovereign Immunity Case as an Example. Politics and Law, 2011(5): 15.

[17] Office of the Hong Kong Basic Law Commission of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, 2011, Compilation of Documents of the Drafting Committee of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. China Democratic and Legal Press, Beijing, 272.

[18] Wang Y, 2008, Authorization and Autonomy. Haojiang Law Society, Beijing, 209.

[19] Song X, 2003, On the Relationship between the Central Government and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region under the ‘One Country, Two Systems’. Renmin University of China Press, Hong Kong, 47.

[20] Xu C, 2016, A Classification Study of the Central Government’s Direct Exercise of Powers in Special Administrative Regions. Hong Kong and Macao Studies, 2016(3): 41.

[21] Zhang X, 2015, On the Implementation of National Laws in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region – Based on the Analysis of Article 18. Hong Kong and Macao Studies, 2015(3): 36.

[22] Fan Z, 1998, On the Basis and Formation of the National Legal System of ‘One Country, Two Systems’. Legal Business Research, 1998(2): 17.

[23] Bonner D, 1985, Emergency Powers in Peacetime. Sweet & Maxwell, 1985: 15.

[24] Zhen Z, 1997, The Criminal Procedure Law of Hong Kong. Henan People’s Publishing House, Henan.

[25] Guo T, He B, 2009, Research on Criminal Procedural Law of Hong Kong. Peking University Press, Beijing, 2.

[26] Huang M, 2018, On the Effectiveness and Application of the Constitution in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Legal and Commercial Research, 2018(6): 101–110.

[27] Cheng X, 2001, Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Legal Relationship. Sun Yat-sen University Press, 2001: 30.

[28] Ghai Y, 1999, Hong Kong’s New Constitutional Order, The Resumption of Chinese Sovereignty and the Basic Law, Second Edition. Hong Kong University Press, 1999: 350.

[29] Tian YQ, 1997, Hong Kong Criminal Law. Haitian Publishing House, 1997: 161.

[30] Zhu G, Huang H, et al., 1997, Hong Kong Judicial System. Henan People’s Publishing House, Henan, 77.

Share
Back to top