ARTICLE

Volume 11,Issue 1

Cite this article
6
Citations
19
Views
16 March 2026

Analysis of the Accuracy of 3.0T Magnetic Resonance in Diagnosing Knee Meniscal Injuries

Wanning Qiu*
Show Less
1 Department of Radiology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu, China
JMDS 2026 , 11(1), 42–46; https://doi.org/10.18063/JMDS.v11i1.1351
© 2026 by the Author. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objective: To analyze the accuracy of 3.0T magnetic resonance in diagnosing knee meniscal injuries. Methods: From February 2024 to January 2025, 62 cases of knee meniscal injuries were selected for data analysis in our hospital, and 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging and CT imaging were performed. The gold standard was the results of arthroscopy. Results: The gold standard suggested that there were 101 meniscal injuries in the 62 patients in this article, with an incidence rate of 81.45% (101/124). Compared with CT examination, the sensitivity and accuracy of 3.0T magnetic resonance diagnosis were significantly higher, P < 0.05, and the contrast specificity was P > 0.05. Comparing the severity of meniscal injury diagnosed by the gold standard and 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging, P > 0.05. Conclusion: The accuracy of 3.0T magnetic resonance in diagnosing knee meniscal injuries is high, significantly higher than that of CT diagnosis, and is worthy of clinical promotion and use.

Keywords
3.0T magnetic resonance
Knee meniscus injury
Diagnosis
Accuracy
References

[1] Cheng L, 2023, Discussion on the Application of Magnetic Resonance in the Diagnosis of Knee Meniscal Injuries. Imaging Research and Medical Applications, 7(06): 105–107.

[2] Zhang XL, 2025, Analysis of Accuracy and Sensitivity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Knee Meniscal Injuries. Modern Medical Imaging, 34(04): 682–684.

[3] Zhang PP, Luo H, 2025, Analysis of the Application Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Knee Meniscal Injuries. Contemporary Medical Review, 23(09): 89–91.

[4] Cui JJ, Wang RJ, Xiao YC, 2024, Imaging Characteristics and Diagnostic Value of Multi-Slice Spiral CT Combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Knee Meniscal Injuries. Journal of Practical Medical Technology, 31(12): 861–864.

[5] Wu CB, Liu YY, 2024, Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Conventional Spiral CT in Knee Meniscal Injuries. Medical Frontiers, 14(19): 30–32.

[6] Zhang Y, Huang LP, Wang L, 2025, Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of 3.0T Magnetic Resonance for Knee Meniscal Injuries. Imaging Research and Medical Applications, 9(11): 126–128.

[7] Ma WB, Luo Y, Liu JL, et al., 2023, Study on the Consistency Between 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopy in Diagnosing Knee Meniscus Injury. Chinese Journal of CT and MRI, 21(09): 170–172.

[8] Tian HF, 2025, Imaging Changes and MRI Diagnostic Effect of Knee Meniscus Injury. Modern Medical Imaging, 34(01): 78–81.

Share
Back to top